Wouldn’t that be nice if there was one compact and lightweight stove that could be used for everything? The fact is that there isn’t a lightweight hiking stove that performs perfectly in every climate and activity. Some small compromises need to be made.
Here is the process to follow when choosing a single stove that will best suit their outdoor adventures.
Consider this:
- What are you cooking? Are you a gourmet camp chef, or do you like the convenience of freeze-dried/dehydrated food?
- Think environment? Target your purchase to suit the climate in which you will be undertaking most of your adventures.
- Which fuel? Think about where you will be travelling to, and the type of fuel that will be available there.
1. Canister stoves
These are the most popular, fuss-free stoves, and are probably what a majority of people picture when they think of a hiking stove. They use resealable gas canisters with Lindal valves that utilise a common thread and are interchangeable between brands.
Pros
Lightweight, compact, simple to use, good heat control, relatively inexpensive.
Cons
Poor performance in the cold (unless regulated or inverted), need to carry out empty canisters, upright models not as stable, difficult to gauge remaining fuel level, canisters can be hard to find in some areas.
Best for
Suits most users who need a versatile, straightforward stove for all types of cooking and activities in warmer environments.
2. ‘All in One’ canister stove.
Utilising the same canisters with a Lindal valve, all-in-one stoves incorporate a cooking pot and burner in the same unit. They provide quick and efficient boiling of water and usually incorporate windbreaks in their design.
Pros
Fuel efficient, quick boil times, easy set/pack up, reasonable performance in the cold.
Cons
Not as versatile (cannot simmer), cannot use other cooksets, expensive.
Best for
People travelling fast and light, ideal for use with dehydrated and freeze-dried meals.
3. Metho (ethanol) stoves
Could be categorised under “Liquid Fuel” stoves, but metho stoves deserve a category of their own on account of their uniqueness and simplicity.
Pros
Reliable, safe and durable (no moving parts), usually includes all pots, pans and windbreaks, performs in most conditions, burns silently, cheap fuel.
Cons
Slow boil time, bulky when purchased as a package with pots and pans.
Best for
A good all-around option for people who are happy to wait a little longer for their coffee, and don’t mind a bulkier stove and pot package.
4. Liquid fuel stove
These stoves burn in any condition and a wide variety of fuels. They are a little fussier to use and maintain, but some of us find that therapeutic.
Pros
Burn hot in all environments, no empty canisters to carry out, inexpensive fuel, easy to gauge fuel level, some run on a variety of fuels (diesel, kerosene, unleaded).
Cons
Heavier than canister options, require priming, expensive, require the purchase of fuel bottle, require maintenance.
Best for
Those who spend their time in particularly cold environments, or who travel remotely and need to utilise whatever fuel is available, or, if you are like me, just want one because it looks cool. Some come with a simmer control making them ideal for group cooking.
Knowing the pros and cons for each stove type will help you to narrow down your selection, but there are still further considerations within each category.
Give us a call, or leave a comment below if you want more advice on choosing the right lightweight hiking stove to suit your activities.
About the writer...
Similar posts...
would love to know the pro’s and con’s of the Biolite equiptment, im considering switching from gas to the biolite just for the recharging benifits alone ( recharges camera’s, power banks, phones etc etc ), only 2 problems i can see with it though is 1, its a touch on the heavy side and 2. not all places alow you to burn wood and only allow gas fires, whats your thoughts?
0
0
Hey Pete,
You’ve touched on both considerations I would raise to any customer asking about these stoves, weight and the fuel you use. The Biolite CampStove has an onboard battery which will give you roughly a full charge for an average smartphone, using the stove will top up the onboard battery but you would have to burn continuously for some time to charge the onboard battery from empty to full, and you would use a lot of fuel.
I was unable to find any information on exactly how long this would take. I think that if you are charging a number of batteries, then a solar set-up may be a better option as you can utilise the suns power for 8+ hours a day rather than just 5-10 minutes of stove burn time once or twice a day.
I’d suggest weighing up the combination of a solar set up with a portable power bank (check out the Goal Zero products) and a lightweight gas stove, versus the Biolite Campstove. I hope my opinions here help.
0
0
All good advice! We actually have all the stoves (and more) pictured in this story. The Trangia remains one of the most versatile and useful for us, and comes with a large variety of pots and even a little kettle for anywhere, compared to some stoves which need specific canisters.
The Jetboil is great for day hikes when you need a cuppa, though the hiker in the family finds it way too bulky for hiking/camping trips, and the accessories are very expensive.
Our MSR Microrocket Stove is a great purchase too, and very small and extremely lightweight. For hikers where weight is analyzed in depth, then this would be the choice for us.
0
0
Thanks for your input Annie. the Microrocket is relatively new to the MSR range i believe, and I don’t have much experience or feedback on its performance, so its good to hear from someone who has used it in the field.
0
0
We have been using the MSR Microrocket since February 2012 – its the stove that family hiker is taking on the Overland Track due to its lightweight and efficiency on a long trek.
0
0